Guideliness

Toogdag guidelines

 

Presenter

 

-          Please send your paper (APA style; 20 pages; maximum 6000 words, including references and abstract) before October 18th to the senior and junior discussant. You will be informed about their contact information by Caroline Vonk after September 15th.

-          Inform the discussant about the goal of your presentation and about the issues you want to discuss with them (theoretical framework, methods, analysis). Choose one focus issue where you want to have feedback

-          Prepare an interesting presentation in English (20 minutes). Raise issues that can facilitate audience engagement. Try to think about the points on the rating scale (below)

 

Discussant

 

-          Thank you for volunteering to be a discussant. You should receive the paper(s) before October 18th. When this is not the case please contact Caroline Vonk (ico.owc@gmail.com or 020-5989244).

-          Please keep in mind that the PhD-students possibly present their research (in English) for the first time and that this can be a challenging experience for them. Try to formulate your feedback in a constructive manner and provide the students with stimulating advice so they can continue their research with new ideas and fresh motivation.

-          After the presentation please try to raise issues that can facilitate audience engagement (max. 10 minutes for each discussant). Each discussant is challenged to involve the audience with discussion points. Please be aware of the fact that the audience did not read the paper. Minor points concerning the paper can be done written or after the session. Each discussant is challenged to involve the audience with discussion points. Please be aware of the fact that the audience did not read the paper. Minor points concerning the paper can be done written or after the session.

-          The (junior) discussant could also give some feedback on the presentation itself by filling out the rating scale (see below) and ask the audience to do the same.

                       

 

 

 

 

           


Rating Scale for Evaluating an Oral Presentation

 

Name:

 

Topic/title:

 

In general, oral presentations should exhibit the following:                          Rating

 

Content

• an interesting introduction and conclusion                                                             1 2 3 4 5

 

• sustained development of theme or argument                                                        1 2 3 4 5

 

• coherence and logical order                                                                                    1 2 3 4 5

 

• adequate supporting details                                                                                   1 2 3 4 5

 

• knowledge of topic                                                                                                 1 2 3 4 5

 

• incorporation of prior knowledge, processes and vocabulary specific to visual art      1 2 3 4 5

 

• sense of personal style and "voice’’ (conveys personal meaning or intention)             1 2 3 4 5

 

Presentation

• a confident and enthusiastic presentation                                                               1 2 3 4 5

 

• use of slides, photographs, blackboards, handouts, humour, concrete objects

to clarify or enhance the ideas presented                                                                   1 2 3 4 5

 

• use of notes when necessary                                                                                  1 2 3 4 5

 

• ability to field questions on material presented                                                      1 2 3 4 5

 

Comments:

 

Comments